2022 Mitsubishi Outlander Review

The Nissan Rogue is one of the best-selling compact crossovers on the market. It’s also sold for less by Mitsubishi–with more.

The Outlander, which shares a platform and mechanicals with the Rogue, seats seven in three rows vs. five in two.

It also has a smaller price tag and a more extensive warranty.

Besides, you might like its looks better!

What It Is

The Outlander is Mitsubishi’s take on the Nissan Rogue, the starting point for this compact crossover. It is one of very few crossovers its size that offers seating for seven and is the only one you can get at this price.

The base ES has three rows, standard, and stickers for $25,795 with front-wheel-drive; with the optional AWD system, the MSRP is $27,595.

For cross-shopping purposes, the Kia Sorento, which is about the same size and offers a third row. It stickers for $29,490 to start with FWD. With the optional AWD system, the Kia lists for $31,790.

A Nissan Rogue, which does not offer third-row seating, stickers $26,050 to start.

It also comes with a five-year/60,000-mile whole-thing warranty. The same thing with a Mitsubishi skin comes with a three-year/36,000-mile warranty. And what’s under this Mitsubishi’s hood is covered for ten years or 100,000 miles even though it’s the same thing that Nissan only covers for five years and 60,000 miles.

A top-of-the-line Outlander SEL Launch Edition with AWD, panorama sunroof, a ten speaker audio system, three-zone climate control, and a 12.3-inch driver-configurable digital display instrument cluster stickers for $35,345.

What’s New

The 2022 Outlander is all new and based on the new-last-year (this calendar year) Nissan Rogue but has its own look with a different ensemble of standard and optional equipment.

What’s Good

  • The least expensive three-row crossover on the market.
  • A better deal with a much better warranty than the same thing (mechanically) sold under the Nissan label.
  • It tows more than its Nissan-badged sibling.

What’s Not So Good

  • The third row is a tight squeeze for people and squeezes out cargo room, which the Outlander has fewer seats in place than the Rogue’s got.
  • There’s only one engine and one transmission like the Rogue, regardless of trim.
  • The mechanically identical Rogue advertises significantly higher gas mileage: 27 city, 35 highway for the FWD version vs. 24 city, 31 highway for the same thing under Mitsubishi skin.

Under The Hood

Regardless of trim, every Outlander comes standard with the same 2.5-liter, 181 horsepower four-cylinder engine, paired up with the same continuously variably (CVT) automatic transmission.

It’s a larger engine than the typical turbocharged 2.0-liter (or smaller) engines that are becoming common in medium-small crossovers, which need a turbo to make up for being smaller. Instead, this engine has high (12.0:1) compression, which basically does the same thing (increases cylinder pressure to make more power) without extra parts and extra expense.

This could save you money down the road since you will never have to worry about replacing the turbo (or intercooler) this crossover doesn’t come with.

It is also the same Nissan-built engine used in the Nissan-bodied Rogue. Still, for some reason, the Mitsu-bodied version is rated as delivering only 24 MPG in city driving and 31 on the highway vs. the Rogue’s 27 city, 35 highway.

Actually, there is a reason, though it has nothing to do with the engine (or the transmission).

The Mitsu-bodied iteration of this crossover is 222 pounds heavier than the Nissan-bodied version (3,593 lbs. vs. 3,371 lbs.), probably because of the extra row and the extra row couple inches of length. Also, the Mitsu’s more stylistically interesting bodywork is blockier and probably slightly less aerodynamic.

There is a compensatory factor — although it applies to both iterations of this crossover: The non-turbo’d engine under both of their hoods doesn’t need premium fuel to deliver its rated horsepower — as is the case with some of the tiny turbo engines out there. That saves you about 30 cents per gallon at each fill-up, which is kind of like getting an extra 2-3 MPG out of each gallon of gas.

Another interesting difference between these mechanically identical crossovers is that the Mitsu-bodied version is rated to tow up to 2,000 lbs. The same wearing Nissan panels carry a much lower 1,350 lb. maximum tow rating. Whether the Nissan can handle up to 2,000 lbs. isn’t the point unless you don’t care about the coverage.

If you tow more than what the company that made your vehicle (and issued the warranty) says it can pull, and something breaks, you’ll be paying to fix it, not them.

Mitsubishi backs Nissan’s engine/transmission for ten years/100,000 miles. In contrast, the same engine/transmission under the hood of the Nissan iteration of this crossover is only warranted for five years and 60,000 miles.

It may only be a marketing difference if something doesn’t break.

But if it does, any Nissan store can fix it or get parts. Some worry about buying a Mitsu because Mitsubishi has a much smaller presence than Nissan, with stores in every town.

That’s not an issue here because the Outlander is a Nissan, mechanically-speaking. Same parts–same service.

You do have one choice in both cases as regards the drivetrain: It’s offered with either front-wheel-drive (standard in most trims) or all-wheel-drive, which is optional in all trims except the top-of-the-line SEL Launch Edition, which comes with it standard.

On The Road

The Outlander feels bigger than it is, as Mitsubishi intended.

Though the underthings are essentially the same, there are some essential differences. Both the Mitsu-bodied and the Nissan-bodied versions ride on the same 106.5-inch wheelbase. Still, the Outlander is wider than the Rogue by more than two inches (74.7 inches vs. 72.4 inches), and this sense of broad-shoulders is accentuated by the Mitsu’s flat and wide hood vs. the Rogue’s more round-shoulder’d stamping.

The downside is that it’s sometimes hard to see over that flight-deck slab of a hood, particularly when negotiating a tight turn on an incline on a narrow gravel road. But as is true with any vehicle, you develop a sense of where things are (and end) as you get used to driving the thing.

Once that is done, you may enjoy the beefy feel of this thing.

Power delivery gives a deceptive sense of the power that’s available — a thing both good and bad. What I mean by this is that the 2.5-liter engine hasn’t got a lot of power to spare, but it feels much stronger than it is, at first, due to very deep (5.694) final gearing. If it weren’t for the CVT automatic’s ability to cut the effective gearing by half or more once you’re rolling, this thing would probably have a top speed around 80 MPH, like a muscle car rear-geared for the eighth-mile without an overdrive gear in its transmission.

It practically lunges forward from a dead stop because it has all that leverage down low. You could be persuaded it has a 3.5-liter V6 under the hood.

But once it gets going and the leverage advantage isn’t there, the modest amount of power on tap becomes apparent. It’s enough–just not plenty. It takes about 8.2 seconds to get to 60.

This isn’t slow; it’s only about half a second behind what’s typical in the class.

But there are times when you may wish there was more power available, as when wanting to get around a Prion-addled driver doing 42 in a 55 but with oncoming traffic in the passing lane closing the gap quickly.

Excepting that, it cuts the mustard. The fact is that if you’re on the ball, you can almost always pass when you need to. Your timing decreases the amount of time required, no matter what speed you’re driving.

Mitsubishi-Nissan does an outstanding job programming the CVT automatic to not behave (or sound) like one. It mimics shifts, even though it doesn’t (CVTs vary ranges), and unlike some CVTs, this one will “shift” to a lower range as you accelerate rather than hold itself (and the engine) in a higher range until you back off the accelerator.

The handling is good enough that this Mitsu-altered Nissan’s ability to cut apexes is limited by its tires, which squeal and slip long before the body rolls.

And like most crossovers, which have four-wheel independent suspensions that can articulate each wheel with off-road irregularities, the Outlander doesn’t force you to crawl up washboard gravel roads to avoid knocking your fillings loose from the reverb.

At The Curb

It’s the looks as much as the warranty (and extra seats) that sell this thing vs. the other thing.

If you didn’t know, it’d be hard to tell.

That goes for the inside and the outside, especially if you choose the optionally available Tech package, which transforms this Mitsubishi into what looks a lot like the latest Land Rover. You sit before a digital instrument panel with a pair of offset scrolling wheels that display engine RPM and road speed. Engine turned facings, diamond-stitched/pleated leather-looking door panel inserts.

Even the shifter looks familiar.

So also the O U T L A N D E R block letter decals on the front of the hood, spaced very much like the block letter decals on another — much more pricey — ride.

But the main difference — or rather, sell — is the Outlander’s extra row. It’s a shame it’s not a rear-facing row, which would give it the legroom lacking and make access easy rather challenging. This is a problem with almost all third rows, excepting those in super-sized crossovers (and SUVs) and, of course, minivans, which have those huge-opening dual sliding doors.

A rear-facing third-row would also be a fun place to sit, especially for the kids these seats are meant for generally. Watching the world recede as the vehicle rolls is a lot more entertaining (and more authentic) than watching another video on the DVD player.

But the government, via its endless regulations, has made offering a rear-facing third-row a non-starter, regardless of that orientation’s superior functionality.

The cost of that extra row is less cargo room behind that row, which is only 11.7 cubic feet in the Mitsu vs. 31.6 in the two-row Nissan. This former is less cargo room than is typically found in most current compact-sized cars. The latter is about twice as much as you’ll find under the trunk lid of most current mid-sized vehicles.

However, if you fold the Mitsu’s second and third row, you end up with a little more total cargo room–79.7 cubic feet vs. 74.1 in the Nissan.

The Rest

All trims, including the base $25,795 ES, come standard with 18-inch wheels, LED headlights, dual-zone climate control, and a six-speaker audio system. The more expensive Rogue comes standard with 17-inch wheels, manual AC, and a four-speaker stereo. If you want the amenities that come standard with the Mitsu in the Nissan, you have to step up to the SV trim, which costs even more ($27,470) than the as-it-comes Outlander.

You can also get 20-inch wheels with the base trim ES without having to step up to the pricier SE, and SEL trims first.

The Bottom Line 

Sometimes the same thing is better when it’s wrapped differently.

Eric Peters lives in Virginia and enjoys driving cars and motorcycles. In the past, Eric worked as a car journalist for many prominent mainstream media outlets. Currently, he focuses his time writing auto history books, reviewing cars, and blogging about cars+ for his website EricPetersAutos.com.

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author.

Not an NMA Member yet?

Join today and get these great benefits!

Leave a Comment

One Response to “2022 Mitsubishi Outlander Review”

  1. Hank says:

    I’ve had one since late last year and like it very much. Good safety features, tech, comfortable.

    Before buying one I recommend visiting the Mitsubishi website and reading the privacy policy for connected vehicle services. Make sure you’re comfortable with the detailed data transmitted back to Mitsubishi and others. If you don’t you won’t likely be able to remote start your car as that feature is app/phone only and it isn’t free. The car cannot be started with the key fob.

    Also I’ve submitted three questions customer care. Each time I get a inquiry received confirmation but no replies to the question. First question months ago. Mitsubishi needs to step up here.